The McKinsey Digital Quotient Framework for Strategic PM’s

This post provides an overview of the McKinsey Digital Quotient Framework. It then unpacks the components and sub-components of the framework, and identifies impacts of the framework to both strategy and project management. Finally, it identifies implications for an organization’s future.

What Is the McKinsey Digital Quotient Framework?

The following 1-minute video from McKinsey & Co summarizes what the Digital Quotient Framework is:

The McKinsey Digital Quotient (DQ) Framework is a tool developed by McKinsey & Company to help organizations assess their digital capabilities and identify areas for improvement. The framework is designed to provide insights into how well a company is adapting to the digital landscape and leveraging digital technologies for business transformation.

The McKinsey Digital Quotient Framework typically involves a series of assessments and surveys that cover various aspects of digital maturity within an organization. These assessments may focus on areas such as strategy, capabilities, culture, and organization structure, among others.

The framework often provides a quantitative score or “Digital Quotient” that represents the organization’s overall digital maturity. This score can be used to benchmark against industry peers and identify opportunities for growth and development in the digital space.

  • Dig into the fundamentals of the McKinsey Digital Quotient Framework
  • Address the rising importance and relevance in today’s digital landscape
  • Establish the connection between the framework and efficient strategic and project management

Why is it called the ‘Digital Quotient’?

Unpacking the Components of the McKinsey Digital Quotient Framework

McKinsey Digital Quotient Framework componentsThe McKinsey Digital Quotient Framework consists of multiple measurable components, with four top level components. The four at the top level of the framework, with their sub-components, are:

1. Culture

  • Risk appetite – What level of risk can the organization tolerate currently, and what might it need to be?
  • Test and learn – Is the approach of testing and learning part of the general mindset? What are some specific areas where practicing that would be most helpful?
  • Speed/agility – What is the general ‘pace’ of the origination regarding change, implementation, responsiveness to external changes?
  • Collaboration – What level of cohesiveness and commonness of purpose and activity exists? Are there silos, and do they need to be broken down?
  • External orientation – What is the tendency: to focus more on internal processes and activities, or to focus on the customer and external market conditions?


  • Linked to business strategy – How does digital thinking relate to the overall strategic direction of the organization?
  • Bold, long-term orientation – What is the vision for the future? Is it aligned with the trends and shifts in the market and external conditions? How much change might be required?
  • Centered around customer needs – What is the strategy centered around? Is it sufficiently customer-focused?


  • Connectivity – What inherent connection capabilities are in place to customers, community, and partners?
  • Automation – To what extent are business processes automated? What is possible now and in the future?
  • Content – What content resources does the organization possess? What capabilities for creating it does it have?
  • Data/analytics – To what degree is the organization capable of analyzing performance and related metrics? What information is available, and can the organization leverage it for insights?
  • Customer experience – How sophisticated is the understanding of customer experience, and the ability to deliver it? And how strong are feedback loops which can help steer adjustments?
  • Technology – What technology capabilities does the organization have at its disposal? What investments have been made, and in what ways is that an asset that delivers value?

Organization and Talent

  • Structure – How is the organization structured to take maximum advantage of its talent resources?
  • Processes – What processes and flows among the resources exist? What value do they provide?
  • People – What core talents do employees and partners have? How do they provide value?

This framework is not unlike some other approaches but differs in its digital uniqueness. The focus is on each of these four components related to the digital world.

The key is to outline the function and impact of each component on an organizational level, and highlight the interconnections among the four main ones and their sub-components.

McKinsey Digital Quotient in Strategy Formulation

Because it has a strategy component, and even asks if it is linked to strategy, the digital quotient framework is considered separate from the core business strategy.

First, being specifically digital in orientation, the framework can help focus the organization. This focus is on digital opportunities, providing metrics for reaching digital maturity, and providing a structured way of tying digital opportunities to strategy.

Second, the framework can help to develop a roadmap to improving digital competency and growth with the organization. This can be tailored to the opportunities presented in the evolving marketplace and the inherent capabilities of the business.

Project Management and the Digital Quotient Framework

The framework is a lot like the Work Breakdown Schedule (WBS). It is matter of breaking down ideas into constituent components, and focusing on each of the components. Those components feed both strategy and project management.

The activities involved with implementing the framework constitute a project unto itself. And project and portfolios can be fed directly from the resulting work breakdown structures.

The framework can be used to prioritize projects in a portfolio. Which digitization efforts, i formed by the framework, should be prioritized?

Project management itself is a capability. A big portion of the project management capability can be totally oriented to digitization. And there can be a focus on enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of the execution of those types of projects.

Future Implications of McKinsey Digital Quotient Framework

The various questions presented above generally take the view of evaluated the organization in terms of where it is now digitally. The most effective application is to take that information and benchmark your organization against competitors – and against the objective state of where you want the organization to be. Then orchestrate a program to prioritize the projects that will move that organization in the desired direction.

I’m not sure how separated digital strategy should be from overall strategy. I would think that in time they will become one, although with its technology component, digital does have unique drivers.

Mastering and leveraging the digital quotient measurement(s) is a viable approach that can feed effective strategy development as well as project portfolio management and execution approach.

Summary and Further Resources

This post provided an overview of the McKinsey Digital Quotient Framework, and unpacked the components and sub-components of the framework. It identified impacts of the framework to both strategy and project management, and identified implications for the future.

Please let us know any thoughts or experience you may have with the framework!

For further perspective on digital transformation, I recommend the following 5 minute McKinsey video, “The Context for Digital Transformation framework”:

Leave a Comment